I investigated a couple of prime bank frauds at the SEC. We made both cases, filing charges that stuck. And I naively thought that the publicity about the scam would bury that type of swindle forever. But that was before I knew what I know now about how the human brain operates. Had I understood the limits of human perception in the investment context and the cognitive biases that come as standard equipment with every healthy human brain, I’d have been much more pessimistic. This week, prosecutors in Illinois indicted a man for taking $4 million from investors in what sounds like a classic prime bank scam. There’ve been hundreds of such cases between my first encounter with this type of scam and the one reported here. According to the Rockford Register Star:
The defendant, James Pantazelos, 61, was charged Tuesday with six counts of mail fraud and four counts of wire fraud alleged to have occurred from May 2007 through December 2010.
According to the indictment, Pantazelos was the owner and CEO of an investment company called Destiny’s Partners Inc. The indictment says he and associates invited individuals to attend conferences around the country to learn about investment opportunities. Pantazelos and his associates allegedly told the potential investors Destiny’s Partners placed its investors’ funds in “Private Investment Trading Platforms,” which traded bank notes in foreign markets.
Pantazelos claimed Destiny’s Partners donated a substantial portion of its profits to charitable and humanitarian causes. In addition, the indictment states Pantazelos promised investors their funds would be safe because the investments would be kept in an escrow account. It is further alleged that he offered the investors a variety of investment “options,” for periods ranging from 90 to 365 days, and promised returns of up to 200 percent.
The indictment states Pantazelos used a substantial amount of the investors’ funds to pay for personal expenses, including buying homes for himself and a family member, remodeling a family member’s home, buying expensive automobiles for himself and family members, and attempting to open a restaurant.
Notice two things about this case. First, notice that the defendant claimed that the investment had a charitbale tie in. I’ve yet to investigate a legitimate investment that made such a claim. You can see why scamsters would use that tactic. It tends to short circuit the inquiry into whether the venture is legitimate or a scam.
Notice also the extravagant spending. We’ll say it again: If the person who has your assets spends money like a trust fund baby on a weekend shopping bender, he is spending your money, not his own.
Please read the SEC’s materials on prime bank frauds. And please read what we reveal about that species of fraud inThe Vigilant Investor. Once you understand what we explain about how the human brain processes information in the investment context, you’ll understand them better and be better able to protect yourself and others.
There is no other area of the law in which ordinary citizens can be so involved in bringing criminals to justice. Consider yourself deputized to help clean up an investing landscape crowded with very dangerous people.
| Tags: Public
Posted October 29, 2011 by John Wane under Financial Guru